TO ALL USERS:
Okay, as blunt as I can be, I need some feedback and help from you folks. That's it in a nutshell.
This whole CI.A. thing has been an enormous drain on my resources and this forum, in particular, while definately an important item, has been a hassle.
Awhile ago I switched formats for the purpose of adding another measure of security as the previous forum did not allow moderation of comments.
The new blog-style forum DOES allow moderation, which is important to us here, but the format is kindof clunky and a not very user/browser friendly.
I've tried 5 different free forum services and the closest I could find that would give me all of the features needed was Board Host. That worked, but looked pretty bad with no real way to change the layout and look.
So, that said, I'm fried on this folks. B. Smith wants to know if there's another forum format.... I would like to suggest that I'm not going to have much time in the next week and a half to shop around and find one. If any of you have suggestions or can point me to a comprehensive free forum system that will allow site moderation (allowing the administrator to preview posts before the go live) and has a killer easy-to-use format, please let me know where to go to find it and I'll set it up.
Otherwise, it's going to be until after the holiday until I can get back to this.
Thanks all.
Samuel
Hi All:
This came in under a previous post recently and it's published still under "NIMBY" "Young Person Desparate...."
I thought that it warranted its own post, however. So, have at it, folks.
I'll be back with you all soon with video from the Landfill Summit
Peace,
Samuel
FROM A PROUD NIMBY:
Well folks, it is sad to see in tonights newspaper that the Boggs Township supervisors have sold us down the river - AGAIN. They had a long standing ordinance in place that would not have allowed PA Waste to accept garbage on Saturday's or during certain hours but they (the supervisors) showed their lack of a spine and agreed to change their long standing ordinace to pacify PA Waste.
What this will do is allow more hours during the weekdays and now will allow Saturday's for trash to be delivered to the Boggs Township site.
Of course we can expect the argument will show up here shortly that "they had no choice because PA Waste would sue Boggs Township if they didn't change it".
The question is: Doesn't it make you the least bit suspicious that PA Waste, any time they think they can't get exactly what the want will threaten court action??? If they are our friends as they claim to be, why are they always being the bully?
The sad thing is that once they get their permit, they will - WILL - sell off to an established landfill company and laugh, laugh, laugh all the way back to Harrisburg!!! And never take another phone call from the Boggs Twp Supervisors HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Cha-Ching! The sad thing is, the supervisors don't even realize how they are being played.
Hi Everyone,
We have switched our forum system to a blog format effective October 27th, 2006.
This was done for a couple of reasons. Please read the update below:
1.) The completely open forum allowed posts to go up in immediately with no moderation possible. This has posed a bit of a problem in regards to abuse of the free forum. While I do pretty much live on my computer I cannot watch this post 24/7 and therefore have decided that a moderated format is necessary to protect all associated with the site from material that might result in hassles for us (copyright infringement or personal slander claims etc.) It's fine to openly discuss policies and call local business and community leaders to task, and it's fine to espouse opinion. But we must be very careful to not abuse this forum to go beyond that into the realm of personal attacks. The new moderated format will provide this security.
2.) Though not endorsed, we do still permit anonymous posting. All are encouraged to use their names in any posts or comments.
3.) If you wish to post a new topic of discussion, see our POLICIES page and send and SEND US AN EMAIL as you wish it to be posted and titled and we will consider it for publishing. The new format also allows for HTML links and images to be inserted which is a nice feature.
4.) Note the new format has options to select your own layout. It's a little confusing at first, but give it a try and you'll notice that it will quickly make sense.
5.) ALL POSTS FROM THE PREVIOUS FORUM HAVE BEEN COPIED AND PASTED ON THE NEW SYSTEM! Please note that you can still view the ORIGINAL OLD FORUM HERE but you will not be able to post directly to it. I've consolidated the old blog entries along with these old forum entries as well.
If you have any questions, please contact me directly.
Peace,
Samuel Anthony Ettaro
www.citizensadvocate.net
Samuel Anthony Ettaro   IP: 209.158.23.191 Oct 26, 06 - 10:28 AM | Waiting for a Response from Gant Daily Over this past weekend Dennis Biancuzzo and myself addressed our concerns about media coverage of the Landfill Summit as well as the omission of my presentations to Borough Council on this topic and the Sunflower Campaign from subsequent reporting directly to The Progress, the Courier and Gant Media. We received no reply from The Progress, but did note a very nice and factual report on the event yesterday to which we have publicly expressed a sincere thank you and kudos. The Courier got back to me pretty quickly basically stating that the only person they mentioned regarding the landfill summit angle was Marve Smith and that they have a policy in place of not writing about events that could be construed as political just before an election. Of course, I disagree with this notion and don't really accept it, but at least they got back to us quickly and answered our concerns and did say they would look at running a story a couple days before the event. I'm assuming that this is because it would be after the election. From Gant, we received no reply until yesterday morning and that came after I sent a simple email reminding them of our initial concerns and asking for a response by the end of the day. To this request I received and email from Gant's Editor that simply stated: "Help. I'm being harrassed. What do I do". I followed with a simple reply. "How about tell the truth and simply provide answers to the questions we've asked.... Why were my presentations omitted from your coverage of the Borough Council Meeting? Why is the Landfill Summit being presented with the slant that it has been? Why is no further contact information being offered?" I asked for a straight and honest answer to these very simple questions and suggested that if there is official policy in place with explains the coverage in question, I would gladly report that on this site. I received a brief response apologizing for the email that I received and that it "was meant for my aunt". She went on to promise that she would look into this and get back to us. Dennis Biancuzzo followed up with an email that would be classified as a bit more terse in nature and expressed more concern over the accusation and childish nature of the response. I don't know who Mrs. Wall's aunt is or why she was reporting to her that we are harrassing her by asking these questions, but to date, Thursday the 26th, neither myself or Dennis Biancuzzo have received a reply to our very simple and valid inquiry. Likewise, I had sent an email to Gant's sales staff asking for rates and statistics on banner advertising on the front page specifically for the Landfill Summit. I forwarded a concern to Mr. Biancuzzo as well as Mrs. Walls that I had sent this request for information and had not yet recieved a reply. Almost imediately I received and email from a sales rep at Gant, apologizing for being very busy and offering to meet with me to discuss options. I expressed to her a thank you, but declined to meet in person as I don't have time and simply asked for: 1.) Rates for a banner ad on the front page. 2.) Stats as to how many people will see the ad. TO date I've received no reply. So What Constitutes Harassment? From what I found on the web it is defined legally by: Harassment: General Under the United States Code Title 18 Subsection 1514(c)1. Harassment is defined as "a course of conduct directed at a specific person that causes substantial emotional distress in such a person and serves no legitimate purpose". Modern Penal Code Definition: The Modern Penal Code section 250.4(MPC) defines harassment as a petty misdemeanor if with purpose is to harass another, one: 1) makes a phone call without a legitimate purpose; or 2) insults, taunts or challenges another in a manner likely to provoke violent or disorderly response; or 3) calls at inconvenient hours or in offensive language; or 4) subjects another to offensive touching; or 5) engages in any other course of alarming conduct serving no legitimate purpose of the actor. I fail to see how asking these questions would constitute harrassment. Mr. Biancuzzo's request included a direct reply to just how they feel they are being harrassed and why? No response to this question either. And so the mystery continues. Is there policy that explains our concerns away, are we being black-listed, or is there something more happening? That's the story, folks. If the integrity of the local press matters to you and you have a concern over how CI.A. has been handled by this outlet, please involve yourself. Sincerely, Samuel |
| B. Smith IP: 4.239.180.171 Oct 26th, 2006 - 11:04 AM |  Re: Waiting for a Response from Gant Daily Samuel, I don't know if this ties into anything or not, but I have noticed a major shift in reporting from Gant in the last several weeks. When first started Gant appeared to be cutting edge and reported facts, and didn't keep facts hidden. It seemed to be something good. In the last little while Gant has become a watered down version of it's former self. They seem afraid to ask the pointed questions, as in today's article on the RHJ Medical center. They showed only one side of the situation giving the article the tone of "our friend the medical center" making it sound like a wonderful thing. An issue such as this, having many opposed to it, needs to have both sides represented. They sang it's praises, but failed to acknowledge the founded fears and opposition of the many people of the county who do not want the center. |
| Samuel Anthony Ettaro IP: 209.158.23.191 Oct 26th, 2006 - 11:11 AM | Re: Waiting for a Response from Gant Daily Hello B. Smith, I like you felt that same when Gant first started up and, again like you, have noted the same sort of change. One can speculate forever on this but it would be helpful for these folks to address this concern openly so we can hear it from them and not have to rely on our conjecture? I've also noted an enoromous drop in the Opinion pieces. At the beginning of this venture, they published quite a bit of local opinion and recently that has dropped significantly. I appreciate you keeping tabs on these issues as it does matter and simply illustrates the need for a real free-speech site like CI.A. that does not have business affilition concerns to deal with such as local investors and/or advertising revenue and/or subscription concerns. Encourage anyone that you can to get involved with this site and let's keep asking the questions that matter and presenting valid opportunities and plans for growth and addressing of the issues we all face! Change isn't going to come through a commercial news venture and it's not going to come through local politicians, it's going to come from the PEOPLE! Sincerely thankful for your diligence, Samuel |
| whoami? IP: 207.255.156.98 Oct 26th, 2006 - 6:46 PM | Re: Waiting for a Response from Gant Daily Mr. Ettaro if I am to be completely honest I think that this is a case of the pot calling the kettle black. You accuse Gant of shedding light on only 1 side of a story. Why don't you do the same. You assume your readers do not know the rest of the story. The other side of this story is that you harbor personal feelings of resentment and hostility against members of Gant. The success of Gant has made you ripe with jealousy and take note: the green eyed monster looks ugly on you. You take it personal that Gant has not given you the attention you demand. So you rant and rave like a 2 year old who's been told "no no" and you stomp your feet and scream real loud. Before you go any further Sammy perhaps you should step back and scrutinize not the policies and time schedules of Gant employees but rather your own journalistic integrity and passive aggressive nature. I now question the quality of all other work in your name. whoami? PS May I request a dignified response and not more toddler styled tantrums labled free press. |
| ..... IP: 71.240.213.203 Oct 27th, 2006 - 4:34 AM | Re: Waiting for a Response from Gant Daily  You said it!! |
| Samuel Anthony Ettaro IP: 72.72.206.71 Oct 27th, 2006 - 5:05 AM | Re: Waiting for a Response from Gant Daily Hi Whoami, Well, seeing as you didn't sign your name I have to only assume that you are one of the many folk in this area who THINK that they know me and my motivations and what's in my heart. I'm not jealous of Gant. Get that straight. I think we need more of this sort of thing in this area and in the beginning of this venture even sent people there. Heck, Gant was the source that originally published my op-ed on the Nazi/Fair situation. If I were so resentful of this outlet and the people there and were SO jealous of them as you say, why would I have utilized the outlet? I wouldn't have. You are wrong, flat out, in your assertion there. Second, I'm not throwing a tantrum. The facts are the facts. The attention isn't about ME, it's about the facts of the story. YOU are making it about me, and that's your call. Second, I nor anyone here at CI.A. have never claimed to be "journalists". We're concerned citizens, business people and community leaders and organizers who are using our voices to address issues important to us. We never claimed to be balanced, fair, or otherwise be an official news outlet that gives the latest local news TODAY! So your comparisons to Gant on my behalf are wrong, as well. It's not calling the pot calling the kettle black, it's apples and oranges. Regarding the rest of my works, that's your opinion. No skin off my substantial nose. So, that all said.... Will we ever learn the truth about whether or not the slant and ommissions from these stories was due to policy or a blacklisting / moritorium that was placed on me and CI.A.? And if it was the later, why is that being done? Thanks for, again, trying to divert the real issue back to a personal slam on me, though. You guys just keep making my point. Samuel |
| whoami? IP: 207.255.156.98 Oct 27th, 2006 - 6:12 AM | Re: Waiting for a Response from Gant Daily By "you guys" you imply that I am a "Gant" person. That is an assumption. And, you have used your child like assumption to imply that I am Gant trying to make a point. On the contrary, I too am a simple citizen trying to get to the bottom of something. My apologies to Gant. I didn't realize my comments would be derailed and dumped on your lap. |
| Samuel Anthony Ettaro IP: 72.72.227.253 Oct 27th, 2006 - 6:25 AM | Re: Waiting for a Response from Gant Daily Wrong again, whoever you are. By "you guys" I meant the people who refuse to address the issue that was brought up in my original complaint which is why the slant in the reporting and why the blatent omissions. 1.) By "you guys" I meant the people who then, after ignoring those questions and attempts to get questions to those answers, make an obvious attempt to divert attention AWAY fromo those questions and the underlying issues by making a personal attack upon me. 2.) "You guys" meant people who are doing those things. If the folks at Gant fall within those categories, that's up to them. My comment was not directed to them and I was NOT assuming that you worked for Gant. Again, you're putting words in my mouth and making assumptions regarding my intent. Again, see the above two points. Perhaps you might want to offer some insights into the original two points outlined above rather than continuing more of the same. Your call. I'm wide open to suggestions. S. |
| Samuel Anthony Ettaro IP: 71.162.63.82 Aug 24, 06 - 6:05 AM | Clearfield's Drug Problems Hi Everyone, This is a general post intended to start an open dialogue on the issue of the serious issue of drug abuse among our young people. Recently, an anonymous blogger commented on this issue of import and we feel that it's something that should be addressed. I'm not personally up to date on these issues, however, I do have concerns and would appreciate your help in pointing me in the direction of stories to cover and interviews to conduct so we can start an open and constructive dialogue on this subject. To be on the record in response to these anonymous comments, I do see this as a concern, I do wish to utilize this network to address this problem and I do encourage the community to help us bring light on this subject. To our anonymous friend, my offer still stands for him/her to be specific, come forth, put their efforts and talents to the cause that they are touting and help us educate folks on this issue. Looking forward to your assistance and input in this matter. Sincerely, Samuel Anthony Ettaro Producer | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Read Today's Edition Of The Progress 9/18 IP: 4.239.180.131 Sep 18th, 2006 - 2:15 PM | Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems Front page, banner headline. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Problem in Clearfield IP: 12.163.93.47 Sep 19th, 2006 - 9:00 AM |  Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems With the recent Progress reports, the drug use is being noticed. I do recognize the drug problems in our town, first hand. I have been a victim of several crimes, of which were thefts. I have been in contact with the police and have found out some interesting facts. With the release of one full time officer, and some bad decisions on whom I believe to blame is Borough Council, the officers have been forced to working with only two officers on a shift. This has created several problems. Who is to blame for this ? As a tax payer I believe that we need to know this information. Clearfield has increased the right to work tax to $52.00, and has just bragged about obtianing $20,000 in amusement tax. Where is this money going ? From how it seems, it is not going into enforcement. As stated in todays issue of the Progress " Chief Jeff Rhone of the Clearfield Borough Police Department said the rise in drug use in recent years is “astounding,” and said the police department doesn’t have enough officers to keep up. " Chief Jeff Rhone needs to hire the officers to help out. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Samuel Anthony Ettaro IP: 71.162.40.143 Sep 19th, 2006 - 12:25 PM | Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems I'm not well versed enough on the situation of the police force in Clearfield borough. A contributor to the site wrote a couple of opinion blogs, but that's the extent of my knowledge of the overall picture. Yes, as a taxpayer, you're certainly correct that you have a right to know. Have you contacted the council directly with your concerns? I would be curious what you find out. S. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Read Today's Edition Of The Progress 9/19 IP: 4.91.128.151 Sep 19th, 2006 - 9:30 PM | Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems Yes! kudos to The Progress for throwing much needed focus on a major Clearfield problem. A five night series at that. Bravo. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| H. Moore IP: 198.77.42.223 Sep 20th, 2006 - 5:40 AM | Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems It is fantastic that the Progress is focusing on the drug issue in Clearfield. Having a relative on the Police Force I have been brought up to speed with this problem. It is truely tragic. As far as the lack of officers, that is very true as well. Borough Council has been well aware of this problem, as reported in the Progress six months ago. I believe that they stepped ahead and hired additional help. As I understand it now, that help is now gone and the officers are limited. I plan to address the Borough Council and Mayor on this, and would hope that others would do as well. After reading some posts on this forum, a reccomendation was made to hold a community nigh, that is a great idea. What will it hurt ? Granted, some kids/adults addicited will not seek or want the help, but there are some out there that will take the help with open arms. We need to take back our community. This will take everyone to help out. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Samuel Anthony Ettaro IP: 72.72.199.134 Sep 20th, 2006 - 9:47 AM |  Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems Hi there H. Moore.... Please advise me as to you plan for addressing this issue publicly. I would like to arrange to have that recorded for this site. Also, I would strongly agree with you that we need to hold a meeting to address a development agenda for 2007. It doesn't matter if only three of us show up, it needs to happen. We firmly believe that so much of the problem here is a matter of lack of hope and inspiration. A vibrant artistic scene and open, vigorous involvment in civics can not only be FUN and educational but can help, long term, offer consistent and thought-provoking opportunities to our youth. AND US ADULTS TOO!!! Lord knows there are a lot of people around here who could use to loosen up and WAKE up! How and when would you like to get people together? Do we start out small word of mouth, or actually flyer and advertise around town to an "open house"? Lots of different ways to get the word out.... Hoping to meet you soon! Samuel | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mike IP: 12.183.102.5 Sep 20th, 2006 - 8:07 PM | Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems I'm glad to see that people are voicing their concerns. Folks, I'm the officer that was let go. I know the problems that the area is facing. It's getting worse. The guys are doing everthing they can. They are good officers. There is something holding them back though. If you want to make a difference, go to your council meetings. Tell them! Tell them you want your town back! As for my situation, I was not let go for discipline problems. I had a clean record. I was never given a reason. I could only speculate. Even that reason was not a good one because it was taken care of. I'm disappointed with the council, not mad. They were given false information. They went with what they were told. I would like the opportunity to address them again. I would like the opportunity to get my job back. Mr. Ettaro: People like you make a difference. Keep being proactive. Clearfield needs good men like you. Thank you for the kind words and keep up the good work!!! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dennis Biancuzzo IP: 69.137.168.150 Sep 21st, 2006 - 4:10 AM | Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems Excellent forum opinions. I would add one thing, it will take more than the Clearfield Borough Council and Mayor to enforce the drug problem. It will also take the citizens of the County, to work along side of the Police Department. The Department of Justice "Weed and Seed Program was developed for communities such as Clearfield. The Weed and Seed strategy is based on a twopronged approach: 1. Law enforcement agencies and criminal justice officials cooperate with local residents to “weed out” criminal activity in the designated area. 2. Social service providers and economic revitalization efforts are introduced to “seed” the area, ensuring longterm positive change and a higher quality of life for residents. The Weed and Seed strategy recognizes the importance of coordinating federal, state, local, and tribal offices; law enforcement agencies; and criminal justice initiatives with social service providers and privatesector and community efforts to maximize the impact of existing The primary objectives at each Weed and Seed site are to— Develop a comprehensive communitybased strategy to control and prevent violent crime, gang activity,drug trafficking, and drugrelated crime. Coordinate existing and new government and privatesector initiatives, criminal justice efforts, and human services and concentrate those resources in designated neighborhoods to maximize their impact. I have been talking to the Mayor about this program, she is very interested, and is going to be taking it to the Borough Council. Dennis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Samuel Anthony Ettaro IP: 71.162.62.97 Sep 21st, 2006 - 10:09 AM | HOSKAVICH SITUATION---Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems Hi Mike, Well, what can I say? We're trying. It's been a very strange and interesting experiment this whole CI.A. thing, you know? I'm sure you can imagine. Basically, my thoughts on this are well-summarized througout this site in various forms, but it all boiled down to waking folks up as to how things work around here. I've tried in many ways to affect some sort of change in this regard over the years to no avail, so, when a particular issue struck me hard, I decided to just drive the ol' truck right into the apple tree and see what falls out, what's still hangin there, and who comes to grab the apples that fell out that aren't riddled with parasites. Graphic, I know, but I don't really know how else to put it. I could have used the whole enema analogy, but this seems a bit more pleasant. Anyway, Mike, I don't know much about your situation, nor what the police are facing out there. Our contributor, Art Notes, does seem to have a bit more of a handle on this than I and I know a lot of people think Art is ME because the IP address is the same on his and my posts, but he's not me. I get those posts via email then post them myself. So I would very much welcome an opportunity to learn more about: 1.) How the borough and mayor's office view law enforcement and what their official policies are regarding some very serious issues faced by the Citizen's of Clearfied. 2.) What we as a people can do to reach people and get them involved in positive activities. This aimed at helping to offset the boredom, lack of hope and general spiritual, emotional, financial and cultural exhaustion that can be an oppressive and negative side-effect of living here. That said, I appreciate your personal and professional situation and am very interested in learning more of your viewpoint and addressing these issues in a public forum should the story warrant such actions. Bottom line is this. Ask anyone on the street about how things work here and they'll all say the same thing "Old Money".... "the good-ol' boy network".... etc. etc. Now do I believe in a cabal of local high-rollers sitting around in smokefilled rooms planning on how they will control everything to their benefit. NO. Do I believe that there is a fundamental mindset that is prevelant in this area that exhibits itself through ways of doing things that look like the above to speculative realities? ABSOLUTELY Folks around here do thing LIKE that. They operate and base their opinions on half-stories, assumptions, rumors and gossip and usually on who these decisions will truly benefit. People seem to be so very concerned about "making waves" or doing things that may be "perceived" as "making trouble" or "rocking the boat" or being "weird" that they generally just stay in this closed little safe zone. That's the quality of leadership that we have around these parts. Not everyone, but most that I've seen. These type of folks are truly followers, not leaders, and the public needs to be aware that followers in positions of leadership will only put us as a region right here, where we are, treading water. For progress to ensue, REAL long-term sustainable progress, certain aspects of our regional leadership and just "how things are done" around here must be looked at from a different angle and the people need to take more responsibility for their lot in life. BOOM. How's that for a goal? It's a mind-set, not a specific group of people operating behind closed doors that is the enemy here. That's what we're trying to change. Open and honest government and civic happenings are crucial to our cause. If they won't be so open, then we put the camera on them and force them to be honest. This is a heavy handed approach but sad to say that it seems that it was necessary to get the followers POSING as leaders to understand fully that there are intelligent, motivated people in these parts that have had enough and are going to effect change, with or without their cooperation and without them controlling the situation and outcome. I know that's scary for folks around here, but they should be inspired by the possibilities that this sort of grass-roots media effort can produce... IF they get involved and use the new tools that we're making available. If you have information that can help educate the good people of this area, serve to inspire and help them, I'm willing to listen. You have my contact numbers. Give me a call. Sorry for going on so long, but you really caught me in a mood. Sincerely, Samuel Anthony Ettaro | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Problems IP: 12.163.90.104 Sep 21st, 2006 - 4:56 PM | Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems Officer, I would like to you speculate to what you thought the problems are. I would like to know. Are there enough officers to cover the problems, not only with the drug situation, but with other problems that arise ? Has there been any words spoken about replacing you, or is Clearfield now without another officer ? With the "weed and seed" program, how can this work when you do not have anyone to do the "weeding". Please ask the mayor that. I do not believe that the mayor is concerned. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dennis Biancuzzo IP: 69.137.168.150 Sep 22nd, 2006 - 4:02 AM | Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems The following are emails, I received from the Mayor, she is waiting for the public to come forward. SAM, I think it is time for the CIA to set up a public meeting to openly discuss this problem, I've invited council, and the mayor when we have a date, location and time: I quess we will then see how much they care: From : PATTY GILLILAND Sent : Wednesday, September 13, 2006 2:05 PM To : "dennis Biancuzzo" Subject : Re: Department of Justice Police Corp Inbox Thank you for your concern and sharing this information with me. This is also a major concern of mine. I will discuss your letter with the Chief of Police, then council. In the mean time if you would mail me any written information you have on the program it would benefit in promoting. Please mail to Mayor Gilliland - Dennis, If citizens are complaining and blaming council. I cannot act on hear say. I trust you can understand. However, If you relay their written complaints to me I will be happy to act on their concerns. I also strongly suggest you advise them to contact their council representatives in writing with copy to myself. 1st Ward: Susan Reed / Joan McMillen 2nd Ward: Mike Errigo/ John Naddeo 3rd Ward: James Leitzinger/Rodger Baumgardner 4th Ward: Phil Biancuzzo/Barry Reddinger Sincerely, Mayor Gilliland | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dennis Biancuzzo IP: 68.82.90.114 Sep 23rd, 2006 - 3:22 AM | Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems Encourage your elected officials to apply for this program: PA WEED AND SEED Operating under the Pennsylvania Commission on Crim and Deliquency Weed and Seed focuses on community-driven prevention, while it attacks the underlying roots that contribute to crime, such as unemployment, lack of a quality education and widespread poverty. It involves collaborative law enforcement between local and state crime fighting teams to eliminate drugs and violence in targeted neighborhoods. At the same time, it works to revitalize and strengthen local leadership. Though this combined effort, Weed and Seed is delivering on the PCCD commitment to create safer and stronger communities throughout Pennsylvania. Weed and Seed is a concept originally created by the federal government in 1991. The initiative attempted to demonstrate a means of mobilizing a large and varied array of resources in a comprehensive and coordinated effort to control drugs and crime and improve quality of life in targeted high crime neighborhoods. The initiative’s name describes a two-pronged strategy: to "weed out" violent offenders via intensive law enforcement and prosecution efforts, and to "seed" neighborhoods with prevention, intervention, treatment, and revitalization services. Community policing was also an integral part of the original strategy, designed to bridge the gap between weeding and seeding efforts. The federal Weed and Seed initiative, implemented through the Department of Justice, focused largely on major urban areas across the United States. Under the leadership of the PCCD, Pennsylvania’s Weed and Seed effort adopts the core concepts of the federal Weed and Seed initiative, along with some new and promising strategies developed by the Governor's Policy Office, the State Police, and the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency ("PCCD"). The initiative seeks to focus on smaller Pennsylvania communities that, nevertheless, face significant challenges to quality of life arising from crime and poverty. Investigative Coordinator Legal Coordinator TALL Team Coordinator AID Team Coordinator The AID team coordinator will be a new employee of the local government or community-based organization with managerial experience and will possess a working knowledge of the target zone. The coordinator will also be familiar with the operations of local government, the local business community, and the community-based and nonprofit organizations operating in the target zone. The primary role of the AID team coordinator will be to assist in identifying the members of the local AID team, and then to coordinate and facilitate the AID team's work and meetings. The coordinator will also be responsible to work with the AID team to develop a mission statement and a statement of objectives, in addition to coordinating the drafting of the Target Area Revitalization Plan. Consistent with the adopted mission and objectives, the coordinator will facilitate and maintain records and reports of the AID team's activities. The coordinator will also represent the AID teammates regular project coordinating committee meetings. The Community Assistance for Impact Delegation (AID). The AID team includes all key members of local public, private, and community organization leadership. The AID team provides leadership, technical assistance, and resource support for the initiatives of the citizens drawn from the target area. The AID team meets regularly with representatives of the local Weed Operations, organizes local resources (e.g., meeting space, publicity, contacts, etc.) and makes these resources available to the citizens drawn from the target area. The AID team also includes "rapid response" liaisons with critical non-law enforcement state agencies, including the following departments: Health, Public Welfare, DCED, Labor & Industry, Military Affairs, and Education. Each participating department develops goals and special services for the target areas. Participating Communites: Pennsylvania Weed and Seed Street Address: Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency 3101 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 Mailing Address Weed and Seed P.O. Box 1167 Harrisburg, PA 17108-1167 Charla Plaines (Deputy Director) (717) 705-0888 ext. 3095 cplaines@state.pa.us James Tice (Site Coordinator) (717) 705-0888 ext. 3170 jtice@state.pa.us Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency Toll-free in PA at (800) 692-7292 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| B. Smith IP: 4.91.129.175 Sep 24th, 2006 - 1:47 PM | Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems If you are passing along comments to the mayor and council my request for them is that they take the initiative to become involved in what is happening in this town. Are they looking at Crossroads? Even the kids talk about the real reason many go there. If you check, most of the local churches are no longer involved there. Why? Why do MOST of the youth REALLY go there? What about the curfew in the borough? why is that not enforced? And I hope they have the intelligence to keep out any methadone clinic that would try to worm it's way into the area. Most people may not realize that "Discovery House" is a business endevour. They are run by a company that has a number of these clinics throught the US. Increasingly, these clinics are raising the eyebrows of law enforcement and city officials as a "problem site". There are often more accidents near these sites. Methadone is not an innocent application. Pepto Bismol is an innocent applicatiion. Methadone is an addictive substance and abuse of methadone is a growing problem in the US. This is not the time, and Clearfield can't afford to have it's "leaders" asleep at the wheel. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| B. Smith IP: 4.91.129.175 Sep 24th, 2006 - 1:58 PM | Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems Another thing I would like to know is how they can justify spending $10,000.00 on a handrail, when that money clearly needs to be spent fighting crime. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Samuel Anthony Ettaro IP: 71.162.36.67 Sep 24th, 2006 - 2:49 PM | Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems Hello B. Smith, I have been in touch with the director of the Crossroads, a young man by the name of Kevin, if memory serves me. That was quite some time ago. I shared with him some of the visions that we here at CI.A. have for youth-focused cultural, technological and artistic programs to help expand the opportunities for our youth to focus on not-so-destructive forms of recreation. We had a great talk on the phone, then I never heard anything back, so, I was interested in learning more about that center, but have not yet had opportunity. If you have some concerns or expressed interest in this topic, I would love to learn more from you. As for your other comments, this goes right to the heart of my arguments about the fundamental mindset in this town all around. There is serious talk about spending tens of thousands of dollars (amount?) on a giant deer right off of I80 to bring "tourists" here. As you mentioned, there is an initiative at hand to boost up the riverfront. Bob's, Grices' and Jim's Sports Center recently decided it would be a good move to have public money's from the CCRTA go to promote their private sales at their respective stores. On and on and on and on it goes.... Where it stops, we don't know? But our kids know one thing, they see this too. They see the enormous amounts of time, energy and money spent in this area to pat each other on the back, put up tinsel and garland without addressing their pain, boredome, personal issues, and downright apathy in any deep, long-lasting way. They see this as clearly as you and I. However, they don't have the leadership among them to show another way beyond small church groups and other civic organizations doing good things in small pockets. I've said it before and I'll say it again here and I'm glad to finally see people jumping on this.... THE PRIORITIES OF OUR LEADERS AND THE GENERAL ADULT TAX-PAYING POPULACE IN OUR REGION ARE IN A LOT OF CASES SELF-SERVING, SHALLOW, NARROW-MINDED, STUCK IN THE PAST, NON-PROGRESSIVE and NON-RESPONSIVE. THIS IS NOT INDICATIVE OF EVERYONE, HOWEVER, IT IS PREVELANT ENOUGH THAT OUR KIDS TAKE NOTICE AND IS ONE OF THE MANY REASONS WHY OUR KIDS FALL VICTIM TO LIVES OF CRIME AND HARD CORE DRUG ABUSE. They see how things work, the look at the state of the world, and figure... ."What's the point?" Again, this is a broad brush I'm painting with, but I think you get the point. We at CI.A. are aggressivly moving forward on setting up a local "summit" to address this problem. We've already been coordinating with several folks high-up in County government, as well as a growing number of concerned citizens. We're not on a witch-hunt, but we will not settle for "good enough" and we will not accept that "we're doing all we can". And most certainly we will not stay silent about these deep problems simply because those in power are not willing or able to step up their game. I've sent this invitation out to others on this forum to PLEASE send us your email so we can add you to our email notification list and coordinate an assembly at a future Borough Council meeting as well as helping us coordinate interviews with local officials for our site, and coordinate a new initiative for a community cooperative that we are looking to establish in downtown Clearfield. There is much work to do and bouncing ideas around this forum is helpful only so far. If you want to take us up on our offer to help publicize and coordinate the above-mentioned efforts, then you must contact us at ciaclearfield@ettaro.com or call 553-9372 to get directly involved. I'm so looking forward to hearing from you and learning more about what we can do together to make Clearfield a better place to live and raise our kids. Sincerely, Samuel Anthony Ettaro www.ettaro.com Email: samuel@ettaro.com Website: http://www.ettaro.com | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| T. Terry IP: 218.56.144.42 Sep 24th, 2006 - 8:09 PM | Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems B. Smith: I agree with a lot of what you said, along with most of the ideas and thoughts on this board. My belief in this problem lies with " what is the Law Officials doing" about this problem. Do you know Clearfield does not have a steady drug enforcement team ? As I was told, they do not have the time, that they work overtime on a Drug Unit Task Force. WHY ? To answer B. Smith's question on the curwfew, it is because there are few police working at one time. Call them, they will tell you. Where is our tax money going ? The sewer project ? Clearfield Council fired a police officer, where is the money that was going to be paid to him. Check Clearfied Boroughs web page in the agenda :NEW BUSINESS MOTION TO NAME RYAN CASSIDY AS INTEREST ARBITRATOR FOR CLEARFIELD BOROUGH IN POLICE CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS. How much of our money is being used for this. I was told that Cortez Bell, who is the paid Borough Attorney, usually handles this. I know that there are several ideas on how to deal with the drug problem. To repeat my thoughts, enforcement is step one. I hope members of the Borough hear these concerns. Please do something. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Annonomous person IP: 84.19.178.179 Sep 24th, 2006 - 8:23 PM | Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems Good luck officer Hoskivich. I wish you the best with your fight. We need you with all the others. The drugs are infectious and they are killing our young. Our community needs to form, stick together and win this war. Community leaders GET INVOLVED - Police - go get them ! Thank you. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dennis Biancuzzo IP: 69.137.168.150 Sep 24th, 2006 - 8:55 PM | Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems I'm just wondering, can anyone tell us why there are so many of the youth in Clearfield turning to drugs and alcohol? Crossroads: if there is a known problem, why aren't parents going to investigate, I know if my kids where going there, I'd be looking into a negative reputation! The skate Park: I have heard, it's almost like a free for all, kids can go over there and do whatever they choose..someone should be checking on them, can't a police cruiser drive by once in a while, or better yet, why not some of the parents of the kids who use the park take turns spending time with their kids there? Now, let's take a look at where the adults are on this! I've lived in Clearfield, I visit there very often. Yep, why wouldn't the kids be hanging out a Crossroads and the Skate park doing whatever they want, the majority of the parents are either at the Saint Charles, Hedges, One of the many private Clubs, or one of the many hometown favorite small time wateringholes. I'm not saying every parent, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that our kids, take on the behaviors we teach them too. If we want to start blaming people for the drug and alcohol problem in Clearfield on someone let's start with ourselves. Yep take a long look in the mirror, and tell yourself that there is no way you have ever behaved in a way that might have lead a young person to believe that it's ok to drink, or do drugs. I've visited a few of those places I named when I've been in town, and I've seen most people my age or younger, sitting getting drunk while their kids are out - just hanging out - with friends. Why not join them instead of hanging out at a bar or club? They might resist, they might not think it's cool, but I bet they might not do something they may otherwise do if their parents were not with them! Ok, now that we have ourselves dealt with, then we can go to the Mayor and the Law Enforecment, and the Borough Council, and the Commissioners asking, where is our help to deal with the influences our kids are facing. Oh, wait, let's not forget another important portion of the youth's life, SCHOOL! My understanding is that the youth in Clearfield have been using or have had drugs on them in the schools. What am I saying, it's not been reported to anyone that we have drugs in the schools in Clearfield. Of course it hasn't, the school district doesn't want to get a reputation! How about mandatory drug testing in the school, I have no problem with that, at least it might save a kids life! I can tell you this, in Harrisburg, if a kid comes to school with an asprin and is caught taking it, they are either on detention or expelled. Their is a NO DRUG policy in our school system. I have a foster daughter who has allergies, guess what..I drive to her school everyday at lunch time and administer her allergy medicine. Do I mind, sometimes, is it a bother, sometimes, but I'm safe knowing she's at a school that is going to deal with any kid that has as much as an asprin on them. Kudos to everyone ...this is some great dialogue, now let's put it into action! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dennis Biancuzzo IP: 69.137.168.150 Sep 24th, 2006 - 9:28 PM | Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems Personally, I don't believe that the kids in Clearfield are bad, they are just lost, unguided, souls that are seeking their place in life. Some good reading: There are many reasons that kids turn to drugs. But there also are many steps that parents can take to help their children stay drug-free. Barun concludes his discussion of causes and effects of drug use by pointing to the critical role that parents can play for their children: "Therein lies the key: that children feel secure in their parents' love. You've no doubt seen cars sporting the bumper sticker 'more hugs than drugs'? It's not just a clever slogan; doing so can truly make a difference" In his book When Saying No Is Not Enough, Ken Barun lists a number of reasons that kids turn to drugs, and steps that parents can take to prevent this from happening. The main reasons kids turn to drugs are: Peer pressure Boredom Wanting to feel like an adult To escape problems Rebellion To feel good What can parents do about all these things? Lots! Barun gives six types of solutions, which are discussed below. A positive home environment If your child perceives home as a safe, positive, welcoming place, they will be less likely to try to escape - physically and emotionally -- to do drugs with their friends. What helps to make a good home environment in which kids are less likely to turn to drugs? Some characteristics of a positive home environment listed by Barun (p. 102) are: Children receive love from their parents Parents consistently provide support and advice Parents firmly disapprove of drug use, and do not smoke, drink to excess, or use drugs themselves Appropriate discipline is used consistently There is good communication between family members Risk factors at home So far, we have reviewed some of the positive characteristics of home environments associated with low risk for drug abuse. By contrast, some of the negative characteristics listed by Barun (pp. 101-102) for home environments linked with a high risk for drug abuse are: Affection is rarely expressed Parents are neglectful or abusive Parents are too lenient or too strict Parents and/or siblings use tobacco, alcohol, or drugs Parents are dependent on the child, burdening him with their own responsibilities Drug use is not discouraged or discussed Economic pressures arise frequently; either there is too little or too much money Build your child's self esteem High self esteem helps protect a child against peer pressure, because children who feel good about themselves believe they can be accepted by others without doing drugs, and believe they will be able to handle rejection if they are expelled from the group. Most of the techniques discussed above serve to increase children's self esteem. Levant recommends some additional strategies: Build confidence by focusing on the positive and praising your child's accomplishments - even small ones. Use encouragement to motivate your child to change undesirable behavior. If a child makes a mistake, treat it as a learning opportunity and offer your child support, with the understanding that next time will be better. Similarly, when your child makes mistakes, correct your child's actions, rather than passing judgment on your child as a person. Emphasize the importance of improvement, instead of focusing on a need for perfection. Finally, teach your child how to give compliments, not just expect to receive them. Giving a compliment makes both the receiver and giver feel good about themselves. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Watkins IP: 210.110.168.82 Sep 26th, 2006 - 8:31 PM | Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems First off, I had heard about this site and decided to see for myself. Kudos to Mr. Ettaro and all that assist. The site is wonderful, along with the coverage that was given to several important topics. The topic of the drug issue is very big. Look in the news, day in and day out that is what you hear about. If it is not drug dealers, it is the news of robberies, thefts, stabbings, shootings, everything associated with the drugs. I would like to hear what Commisioners - Council Members - and the Mayors office has to say about the drug issues and how they plan to combat the problem. Is there an interview being planned by the CIA to be taped and placed on your site ? I hope so. Again, thank you for creating this site, and opening the eyes up of many. Keep up the good work | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Problems in Clearfield IP: 198.77.42.199 Sep 27th, 2006 - 10:05 AM | Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems Found this added to the Crime Stopers Site: http://clfdcocrimestoppers.com/gallery/wanted/Wanted_Silhoute UNKNOWN ASSAULT ON POLICE OFFICER Description : Information leading to the arrest of the person(s) involved in an assault of a Clearfield Borough Police Officer. On May 16, 2006, Clearfield Borough Police Officer, Brian Dixon, was assaulted at approximately 9:00 pm in the East End area of Clearfield Borough. Officer Dixon was pursuing two male suspects on foot through a field near Bigler Avenue when he was assaulted. Officer Dixon suffered a concussion as a result of the incident. Anyone with information is asked to contact the Clearfield County District Attorney’s Office at (814) 765-2641 Ext 5990 or Clearfield County Crimestoppers at 1-800-376-4700. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kathy H. IP: 195.146.152.130 Oct 5th, 2006 - 1:19 PM | Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems Hello, I have been introduced to this forum in the last few days. There are some major issues being addressed, and I like the head on approach. Today I addressed a letter to Ms. Mayor concerning the drug problems and wanted to discuss possible solutions. I would hope that all others that are on here either had done this alread, or they follow suit. I will let you know what the reply is. Kathy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Samuel Anthony Ettaro IP: 72.72.220.27 Oct 6th, 2006 - 12:59 PM | Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems Hi Kathy, Very nice! Thanks so much! It's nice to know that this is spreading. It's very important to tell your friends about the site and get them out there involved! We really need support right now as shaking the tree this hard is tough work and doing it alone is even tougher! Please come forth, put your name behind our effort and contact us direct beyond the forum so we can communicate and share in real time! Also, please make sure that you tune in to the audio shows on the site. There's some great stuff being said there and it's easily accessible even over dialup! Sincerely, Samuel Anthony Ettaro | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Once again IP: 204.11.87.25 Oct 23rd, 2006 - 9:27 AM | Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems Rite Aid Pharmacy Burglarized, Drugs Taken And once again, drugs are terrorizing our town. This marks the third such incident of a drug store in a five-month time span. In May, C.V.S. and the Medicine Shoppe were hit. http://www.gantdaily.com/news/43/ARTICLE/2721/2006-10-23.html | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Samuel Anthony Ettaro IP: 72.72.236.76 Oct 23rd, 2006 - 12:19 PM |  COPYRIGHTED INFORMATION--Re: Clearfield's Drug Problems B. Smith and all forum users.... Please to not copy and paste copyrighted materials from other websites on this forum. Such items will be imediately deleted. Links are fine. Thank you for keeping up on these stories! Samuel | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| B. Smith 1 Comment(s) / Send Your Comment to Moderator
Friday, October 27th 20066:56 AMNotice: Absentee Ballots Contain Conflicting Instructions!
0 Comment(s) / Send Your Comment to ModeratorFriday, October 27th 20066:55 AMMethadone Clinics Making The News
3 Comment(s) / Send Your Comment to ModeratorFriday, October 27th 20066:54 AMTHANKS TO THE PROGRESS--Integrity in Clearfield Press Exists!
0 Comment(s) / Send Your Comment to ModeratorFriday, October 27th 20066:54 AMAudio Interview with NLC President Jim Hunt
0 Comment(s) / Send Your Comment to ModeratorFriday, October 27th 20066:53 AMHey Borough Council! I've Got Your Handrail Right Here!
0 Comment(s) / Send Your Comment to ModeratorFriday, October 27th 20066:52 AMIs The Landfill Summit A Political Fundraiser?
0 Comment(s) / Send Your Comment to ModeratorThursday, October 26th 20066:56 AMPolice and Fire
2 Comment(s) / Send Your Comment to ModeratorThursday, October 26th 20066:55 AMWaiting for Response from Bill Rishel and/or the Fair Board
0 Comment(s) / Send Your Comment to ModeratorWednesday, October 25th 20066:54 AMno coverage
0 Comment(s) / Send Your Comment to ModeratorSaturday, October 21st 20066:53 AMWho Owns The Landfill Land?
0 Comment(s) / Send Your Comment to ModeratorFriday, October 20th 20066:53 AMMedia True Colors
0 Comment(s) / Send Your Comment to ModeratorFriday, October 20th 20066:52 AMMayors Handbook (actually replace the word "Mayor" and it works for everyone in Elected Offices
0 Comment(s) / Send Your Comment to ModeratorWednesday, October 18th 20066:51 AMCouncilman Mike Errigo Responds
0 Comment(s) / Send Your Comment to ModeratorTuesday, October 10th 20066:51 AMLetter from the Secretary of Education
0 Comment(s) / Send Your Comment to ModeratorSaturday, October 7th 20066:51 AMJust a Hello from Bloomington Ill.
0 Comment(s) / Send Your Comment to Moderator |
Bravenet Blog 
Blog Community
Get a Free Blog
Manage your Blog
Re: Notice: Absentee Ballots Contain Conflicting Instructions! 
Re: Audio Interview with NLC President Jim Hunt 
Re: Audio Interview with NLC President Jim Hunt 
Re: Media True Colors 
bravenet.com